Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941143›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Effect of a novel stretching technique on shoulder range of motion in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficits: a randomized controlled trial.

Omar Gharisia, Everett Lohman, Noha Daher, Alan Eldridge, Amjad Shallan, Hatem Jaber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03044236 (Effect of a Novel Stretching Technique on Shoulder Range of Motion and Maximum Voluntary Contraction in Overhead Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03044236 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of a Novel Stretching Technique on Shoulder Range of Motion and Maximum Voluntary Contraction in Overhead Athletes With Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficits: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled56ConditionsGlenohumeral Internal Rotation DeficitsArmsStretching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Impact of Fascial ManipulationDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar GharisiaDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Everett LohmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Noha DaherDepartment of Allied Health Studies, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Alan EldridgeDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Amjad ShallanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Hatem JaberDepartment of Allied Health Studies, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA. hjaber@llu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-4538
Loma Linda University · USCalifornia State University, Northridge · USHashemite University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cross-body and the modified sleeper stretch have been used to improve posterior shoulder soft tissue flexibility and to increase glenohumeral joint internal rotation (GHJ IR) in overhead athletes. However, due to the inability to stabilize patient's scapula and control GHJ rotation with the cross-body stretch and the potential for subacromial impingement or symptoms' aggravation with the modified sleeper stretch, a new stretching technique (Passive Glenohumeral Internal Rotation with Clam Shell Bridging) was developed as an alternative to these commonly used stretches that may allow for greater stability of the scapula without reproducing symptoms. Thus, the current study aimed to examine and compare a novel stretching technique to the traditional modified sleeper stretch to determine the effect on glenohumeral IR range of motion (ROM) and self-reported pain in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation deficits (GIRD).

methodsForty-two overhead athletes with GIRD [mean age 25.9 ± 2.6 years, 20 males and 22 females] participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned into either novel stretching group or modified sleeper stretching group. IR ROM was measured with a digital inclinometer before, immediately, and at week 4 post intervention, while pain was measured with Numeric Pain Rating Scale before and at week 4 post intervention.

resultsThere was no significant group by time interaction effect for IR ROM (p = 0.27); however, there was a significant change over time (p < 0.001, η

conclusionBoth stretches appear to be effective at improving IR ROM in overhead athletes with GIRD. However, the novel stretching might be more effective at reducing shoulder pain and thus may be more appropriate for symptomatic patients.

trial registrationProspectively registered in February 6, 2017 under Clinical Trial Registry # NCT03044236 .

Indexed as

Muscle Stretching ExercisesShoulder JointAdultAthletesFemaleHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRotationShoulderYoung AdultGlenohumeral internal rotation deficitsNovel stretch techniqueOverhead athletes

Identifiers

PMID33941143
PMCPMC8091767
OpenAlexW3118249641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.