Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941118›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy.

Chengshi Wang, Kejia Hu, Lei Deng, Wei He, Fang Fang, Rulla M Tamimi, Donghao Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chengshi WangLaboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, and Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.
Kejia HuInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lei DengDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Wei HeDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fang FangInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rulla M TamimiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Donghao LuInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. donghaolu@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4186-8661
Karolinska Institutet · SEHarvard University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSichuan University · CN

Funding

Full-time Postdoc Research and Development Foundation of West China Hospital 2019HXBH098National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872307Swedish Research Council 2018-00648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer survivors who develop breast cancer as a second malignancy (BCa-2) are common. Yet, little is known about the prognosis of BCa-2 compared to first primary breast cancer (BCa-1).

methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 883,881 patients with BCa-1 and 36,313 patients with BCa-2 during 1990-2015. Compared with patients with BCa-1, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with BCa-2, using multivariable Cox regression.

resultsDuring the follow-up (median 5.5 years), 114,964 and 3829 breast cancer-specific deaths were identified among BCa-1 and BCa-2 patients, respectively. Patients with BCa-2 had more favorable tumor characteristics and received less intensive treatment e.g., surgery and chemo-/radio-therapy, compared to patients with BCa-1. When adjusting for demographic factors, patients with BCa-2 were at similar risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03) compared to patients with BCa-1. However, when additionally controlling for tumor characteristics and treatment modes, BCa-2 patients were at an increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.15). The risk elevation was particularly greater when the first malignancy was lung, bladder, ovarian or blood malignancy (HRs 1.16-1.85), or when the first malignancy was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28-1.63).

conclusionsOverall, patients with BCa-2 have worse breast cancer-specific survival, compared with their BCa-1 counterparts, although the risk elevation is mild. High-risk subgroups based on first malignancy's characteristics may be considered for active clinical management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedMortalityNeoplasms, Second PrimaryOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBreast cancer-specific mortalityPrognosisSecond primary breast cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33941118
PMCPMC8091680
OpenAlexW3159937253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.