Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941091›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Maternal karyogene and cytoplasmic genotype affect the induction efficiency of doubled haploid inducer in Brassica napus.

Wei Zhang, Yongting Ma, Zhendong Zhu, Liangjun Huang, Asif Ali, Xuan Luo, Ying Zhou, Yun Li, Peizhou Xu, Jin Yang and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Progress on Plant Apomixis for Genetic Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wei Zhang *Chengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yongting Ma *Chengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhendong ZhuChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Liangjun HuangChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Asif AliRice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Xuan LuoChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Ying ZhouChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yun LiChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Peizhou XuRice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Jin YangChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhuang LiAgricultural College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Haoran ShiChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Jisheng WangChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Wanzhuo GongChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Qiong ZouChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Lanrong TaoChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zeming KangChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Rong TangChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhangjie ZhaoAgricultural College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhi LiAgricultural College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Shixing GuoAgricultural College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China. guosx315@sicau.edu.cn.
Shaohong FuChengdu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Chengdu, 611130, China. honzon2010@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial synthesis of octoploid rapeseed double haploid (DH) induction lines Y3380 and Y3560 was made possible by interspecific hybridization and genome doubling techniques. Production of pure lines by DH induction provides a new way to achieve homozygosity earlier in B.napus. Previously, the mechanism of induction, and whether the induction has obvious maternal genotypic differences or not, are not known so far.

resultsIn this study, different karyogene and cytoplasmic genotype of B.napus were pollinated with the previously reported DH inducers e.g. Y3380 and Y3560. Our study presents a fine comparison of different cytoplasmic genotypes hybridization to unravel the mechanism of DH induction. Ploidy identification, fertility and SSR marker analysis of induced F

conclusionThe induction effect is influenced by the interaction between maternal karyogene and cytoplasmic genotype, and the results from the partial hybridization of progeny chromosomes indicate that the induction process may be attributed to the selective elimination of paternal chromosome. This study provides a basis for exploring the mechanism of DH inducer in B.napus, and provides new insights for utilization of inducers in molecular breeding.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticBrassica napusCell NucleusChromosomes, PlantCytoplasmDNA ShufflingGenotypeHaploidyPhenotypePlant BreedingBrassica napusChromosome eliminationDouble haploid inducerPaternal infiltrationPolyploid

Identifiers

PMID33941091
PMCPMC8091669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.