Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33940865›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Katelyn A Berg, Jack H Noble, Benoit M Dawant, Robert T Dwyer, Robert F Labadie, René H Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katelyn A BergDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Jack H NobleDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 2201 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Benoit M DawantDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 2201 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Robert T DwyerDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
René H GiffordDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related ResearchR01DC008408 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LABADIE, ROBERT F · 2007 to 2022
$7.6M
Model-based Cochlear Implant ProgrammingR01DC014037 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, JACK · 2014 to 2024
$5.0M
Cochlear Implants: Combined Electric and Binaural Acoustic StimulationR01DC009404 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIFFORD, RENE H · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
Computer-assisted, image-guided programming of Cochlear ImplantsR01DC014462 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008408NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009404NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the number of channels available to cochlear implant (CI) recipients for maximum speech understanding and sound quality for lateral wall electrode arrays-which result in large electrode-to-modiolus distances-featuring the greatest inter-electrode distances (2.1-2.4 mm), the longest active lengths (23.1-26.4 mm), and the fewest number of electrodes commercially available. Participants included ten post-lingually deafened adult CI recipients with MED-EL electrode arrays (FLEX28 and STANDARD) entirely within scala tympani. Electrode placement and scalar location were determined using computerized tomography. The number of channels was varied from 4 to 12 with equal spatial distribution across the array. A continuous interleaved sampling-based strategy was used. Speech recognition, sound quality ratings, and a closed-set vowel recognition task were measured acutely for each electrode condition. Participants did not demonstrate statistically significant differences beyond eight channels at the group level for almost all measures. However, several listeners showed considerable improvements from 8 to 12 channels for speech and sound quality measures. These results suggest that channel interaction caused by the greater electrode-to-modiolus distances of straight electrode arrays could be partially compensated for by a large inter-electrode distance or spacing.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdultHumansScala TympaniSpeech

Identifiers

PMID33940865
PMCPMC8062138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.