ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2021
EVALUATION OF VGC ANALYZER BY COMPARISON WITH GOLD STANDARD ROC SOFTWARE AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED VISUAL GRADING DATA.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Canine brain imaging with a new low-field portable (0.05 T) MRI scanner: a pilotThe veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of a motion correction software based on partial angle reconstruction in coronary CT angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Assessing the influence of kernel selection on chest computed tomography image quality across varying dose levels using TrueFidelity reconstruction.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Article
- Image quality in ultra-low-dose chest CT versus chest x-rays guiding paediatric cystic fibrosis care.European radiology · 2026Article
- Some common statistical methods for assessing rater agreement in radiological studies.Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2025Review
- High-Resolution 3D Turbo Spin-Echo Wrist MRI at 7T Accelerated by Compressed Sensing.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an artificial intelligence noise reduction tool for conventional X-ray imaging - a visual grading study of pediatric chest examinations at different radiation dose levels using anthropomorphic phantoms.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Image quality assessment in spine surgery: a comparison of intraoperative CBCT and postoperative MDCT.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Lung nodule localization and size estimation on chest tomosynthesis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Image quality of spectral brain computed tomography angiography using halved dose of iodine contrast medium.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Comparison of image quality assessments between interventional radiographers and interventional radiologists using digital subtraction angiography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the use of resampling statistical methods for analysis of visual grading data-implemented in the software VGC Analyzer-by comparing the reanalyzed results from previously performed visual grading studies with the results calculated by gold standard receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology, Obuchowski-Rockette (OR)-Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) multiple-readers and multiple-case (MRMC) and by analysis of simulated visual grading data where the true distribution was presumed to be known. The reanalysis was performed on two multiple-reader studies with non-paired data and paired data, respectively. The simulation study was performed by simulating a large number of visual grading characteristics (VGC) studies and by analyzing the statistical distribution of null hypothesis (H0) rejection rate. The comparison with OR-DBM MRMC showed good agreement when analyzing non-paired data for both fixed-reader and random-reader settings for the calculated area under the curve values and the confidence intervals (CIs). For paired data analysis, VGC Analyzer showed significantly lower CIs compared with the ROC software. This effect was also illustrated by the simulation study, where the VGC Analyzer, in general, showed good accuracy for simulated studies with stable statistical basis. For simulated studies with unstable statistics, the accuracy in the H0 rejection rate decreased. The present study has shown that resampling methodology can be used to accurately perform the statistical analysis of a VGC study, although the resampling technique used makes the method sensitive to small data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.