ReviewActa biomaterialia2021
Personalized models of heterogeneous 3D epithelial tumor microenvironments: Ovarian cancer as a model.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Advanced 3D Model of Vascularized Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in a Tumor-on-a-Chip System Based on Multi-Cell Culture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Combination of oxidative phosphorylation and platelet-derived growth factor inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancers.npj women's health · 2026Article
- Tumoroid model recreates clinically relevant phenotypes of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) cells, carcinoma associated fibroblasts, and macrophages.Research square · 2025Article
- Tumor-associated macrophages contribute to cisplatin resistance via regulating Pol η-mediated translesion DNA synthesis in ovarian cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- The silent spread: exploring diverse metastatic pathways in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Worldwide Research Trends on the Immunotherapy-Based Treatment of Ovarian Cancers: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Cancer 3D Models: Essential Tools for Understanding and Overcoming Drug Resistance.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Paracrine Ovarian Cancer Cell-Derived CSF1 Signaling Regulates Macrophage Migration Dynamics in a 3D Microfluidic Model that Recapitulates In Vivo Infiltration Patterns in Patient-Derived Xenografts.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel frontiers in urogenital cancers: from molecular bases to preclinical models to tailor personalized treatments in ovarian and prostate cancer patients.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
- Advances and challenges in the origin and evolution of ovarian cancer organoids.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Injectable three-dimensional tumor microenvironments to study mechanobiology in ovarian cancer.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- (Dis)similarities between the Decidual and Tumor Microenvironment.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intractable human diseases such as cancers, are context dependent, unique to both the individual patient and to the specific tumor microenvironment. However, conventional cancer treatments are often nonspecific, targeting global similarities rather than unique drivers. This limits treatment efficacy across heterogeneous patient populations and even at different tumor locations within the same patient. Ultimately, this poor efficacy can lead to adverse clinical outcomes and the development of treatment-resistant relapse. To prevent this and improve outcomes, it is necessary to be selective when choosing a patient's optimal adjuvant treatment. In this review, we posit the use of personalized, tumor-specific models (TSM) as tools to achieve this remarkable feat. First, using ovarian cancer as a model disease, we outline the heterogeneity and complexity of both the cellular and extracellular components in the tumor microenvironment. Then we examine the advantages and disadvantages of contemporary cancer models and the rationale for personalized TSM. We discuss how to generate precision 3D models through careful and detailed analysis of patient biopsies. Finally, we provide clinically relevant applications of these versatile personalized cancer models to highlight their potential impact. These models are ideal for a myriad of fundamental cancer biology and translational studies. Importantly, these approaches can be extended to other carcinomas, facilitating the discovery of new therapeutics that more effectively target the unique aspects of each individual patient's TME. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this article, we have presented the case for the application of biomaterials in developing personalized models of complex diseases such as cancers. TSM could bring about breakthroughs in the promise of precision medicine. The critical components of the diverse tumor microenvironments, that lead to treatment failures, include cellular- and extracellular matrix- heterogeneity, and biophysical signals to the cells. Therefore, we have described these dynamic components of the tumor microenvironments, and have highlighted how contemporary biomaterials can be utilized to create personalized in vitro models of cancers. We have also described the application of the TSM to predict the dynamic patterns of disease progression, and predict effective therapies that can produce durable responses, limit relapses, and treat any minimal residual disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.