Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33940169›Full record

ArticleThe ocular surface2021

Spontaneous face- and eye-touching: Infection risk versus potential microbiome gain.

Sascha K R Spencer, Ian C Francis, Minas T Coroneo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ocular surface, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Implications of Long-Term Double Eyelid Tape Use.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sascha K R SpencerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ian C FrancisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Minas T CoroneoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: minas.coroneo@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has piqued interest in spontaneous face-touch as a possible route of microbial infection, with eye-touch of particular importance since the ocular surface is a likely portal of human Coronavirus infection. Spontaneous face-touching is a poorly understood, ingrained habit for humans, who engage in this activity on average between 9 to 162 times per hour. Nearly half of spontaneous face-touches involve mucous membranes, and one third of those involve the eyes. The infective sequelae of self-touch are well documented in ophthalmological conditions such as infectious conjunctivitis, with risks for ocular surface disease beyond primary infection from pathogens such as human papillomavirus. Through tear film conveyance via the nasolacrimal duct, ocular surface pathogens may furthermore have access to the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and respiratory/gastrointestinal systems beyond. Ocular surface and face self-touch therefore represent a concerning possible method of not only local, but also systemic, self-inoculation. Conversely, microbial diversity in the mutualistic microbiome is being increasingly implicated as integral for developing immunity, and protecting against endocrinological and neurodegenerative disease, including those that affect the eye. Spontaneous face-touch brings the hands, the part of the body most in contact with the external world and with the highest temporal diversity, into direct contact with the body's multiple microbiomes. The authors hypothesise that spontaneous self-touch may represent an important mechanism by which the skin, ocular surface, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tracts maintains microbial diversity and prevents dysbiosis. It may be that whilst the eyes are at risk of infection through self-touch, they may paradoxically benefit through the acquisition of a mutualistic microbiome, protective not only for the eyes, but for the body as a whole.

Indexed as

COVID-19MicrobiotaNeurodegenerative DiseasesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TouchBehavioural MedicineInfectious diseaseMicrobiologyMicrobiomeOcular pathologyOcular surface diseaseOphthalmology

Identifiers

PMID33940169
PMCPMC8086376
OpenAlexW3158187852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.