ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021
Should Artificial Intelligence Tell Radiologists Which Study to Read Next?
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review on the impact of deep learning-driven worklist triage on radiology workflow and clinical outcomes.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Radiology Workflow: A Nine-Stage Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in radiology.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Labeling Noncontrast Head CT Reports for Common Findings Using Natural Language Processing.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Positive predictive value and stroke workflow outcomes using automated vessel density (RAPID-CTA) in stroke patients: One year experience.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.