Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939741›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Description and comparison of the skin and ear canal microbiota of non-allergic and allergic German shepherd dogs using next generation sequencing.

Neoklis Apostolopoulos, Stefanie P Glaeser, Ruchi Bagwe, Stefan Janssen, Ursula Mayer, Christa Ewers, Peter Kämpfer, Reto Neiger, Nina Thom

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbiota of Healthy Dental Pulp Under the Omics Loupe.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neoklis ApostolopoulosDepartment of Dermatology, Small Animal Clinic-Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9749-0795
Stefanie P GlaeserInstitute for Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5258-6195
Ruchi BagweInstitute for Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Stefan JanssenAlgorithmic Bioinformatics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Ursula MayerDepartment of Dermatology, Small Animal Clinic AniCura Kleintierspezialisten Augsburg GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Christa EwersInstitute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Giessen, Germany.
Peter KämpferInstitute for Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Reto NeigerIVC Evidensia DACH, Munich, Germany.
Nina ThomDepartment of Dermatology, Small Animal Clinic-Internal Medicine, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis is one of the most common skin diseases in dogs. Pathogenesis is complex and incompletely understood. Skin colonizing bacteria likely play an important role in the severity of this disease. Studying the canine skin microbiota using traditional microbiological methods has many limitations which can be overcome by molecular procedures. The aim of this study was to describe the bacterial microbiota of the skin and ear canals of healthy non-allergic and allergic German shepherd dogs (GSDs) without acute flare or concurrent skin infection and to compare both. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence data revealed no differences of bacterial community patterns between the different body sites (axilla, front dorsal interdigital skin, groin, and ear canals) in non-allergic dogs. The microbiota at the different body sites of non-allergic GSDs showed no significant differences. Only for the samples obtained from the axilla the bacterial microbiota of allergic dogs was characterized by a lower species richness compared to that of non-allergic dogs and the bacterial community composition of the skin and ear canals of allergic dogs showed body site specific differences compared to non-allergic dogs. Actinobacteria was the most abundant phylum identified from the non-allergic dogs and Proteobacteria from allergic dogs. Macrococcus spp. were more abundant on non-allergic skin while Sphingomonas spp. were more abundant on the allergic skin. Forward step redundancy analysis of metadata indicated that the household the dogs came from had the strongest impact on the composition of the skin microbiome followed by sex, host health status and body site.

Indexed as

Ear CanalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSkinAnimalsBacteriaDermatitis, AtopicDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHypersensitivityMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33939741
PMCPMC8092680
OpenAlexW3159557632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.