Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939726›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oluseyi Ayinde, Rachel S Hayward, Jonathan D C Ross

7 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05563233 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of ShotBloker and Helfer Skin Tap Technique on Pain and Fear During Intramuscular Injection in Children Aged 6-12 in the Pediatric Emergency Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled177ConditionsPain, Acute, Fear, Emergencies, Child, OnlyArmsHelfer skin tap technique, Shot Blocker
NCT05933551 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Training for Nurses to Use the Z Technique in Intramuscular Injection Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsNurse's RoleArmsZ Technique Training
NCT05995457 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of the Combination of " Z-track " and " Airlock " Techniques During Intramuscular Injection of Haloperidol Decanoate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenic or Related Disorder : A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2023 to 2024Enrolled84ConditionsSchizophrenia, PsychosisArmsIntramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate using the "Z-track" and "Airlock" techniques, Intramuscular injection of Haloperidol decanoate using standard techniques
NCT06109298 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Cold Spray and Ice Applied During Intravenous Access on Pain and Fear in Children Aged 7-15 Years in Pediatric Emergency Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled96ConditionsChildren, Only, Pain, EmergenciesArmsCold spray, Refrigerated gel ice
NCT06312228 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of the Helper Skin Tap Technique and Buzzy® Application on the Level of Pain and Anxiety Experienced by Children During Vaccination

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled96ConditionsChild, OnlyArmsHelfer Skin Tap, Buzzy
NCT07063160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Acupressure Therapy on Pain, Injection Fear, and Post-Injection Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Intramuscular Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Mediterranean UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsInjection Fear, Injection SiteArmsPain, Fear of injection, Post-injection satisfaction
NCT07233694 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Cold Spray and Stress Ball Methods on Perceived Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErzincan Binali Yildirim UniversitesiRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsPain, Procedural, Acute Pain, Injection SiteArmscold spray gruop, stress ball gruop
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Identification of factors related to pain from musculoskeletal injections.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oluseyi AyindeWhittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-8949
Rachel S HaywardWhittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jonathan D C RossWhittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo review the effect of different intramuscular injection (IMI) techniques on injection associated pain, in adults.

methodsThe review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019136097). MEDLINE, EMBASE, British Nursing Index and CINAHL were searched up to June 2020. Included studies were appraised and a meta-analysis, where appropriate, was conducted with a random effects model and test for heterogeneity. Standardised mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval in reported injection pain (intervention cf. control) was reported.

results29 studies were included in the systematic review and 20 studies in the meta-analysis. 13 IMI techniques were identified. 10 studies applied local pressure to the injection site. Of these, applying manual pressure (4 studies, SMD = -0.85[-1.36,-0.33]) and Helfer (rhythmic) tapping (3 studies, SMD = -2.95[-5.51,-0.39]) to the injection site reduced injection pain, whereas the use of a plastic device to apply local pressure to the skin (ShotBlocker) did not significantly reduce pain (2 studies, SMD = -0.51[-1.58,0.56]). Acupressure techniques which mostly involved applying sustained pressure followed by intermittent pressure (tapping) to acupressure points local to the injection site reduced pain (4 studies: SMD = -1.62[-2.80,-0.44]), as did injections to the ventrogluteal site compared to the dorsogluteal site (2 studies, SMD = -0.43[-0.81,-0.06]). There was insufficient evidence on the benefits of the 'Z track technique' (2 studies, SMD = -0.20[-0.41,0.01]) and the cold needle technique (2 studies, SMD = -0.73[-1.83,0.37]) on injection pain. The effect of changing the needle after drawing up the injectate on injection pain was conflicting and warming the injectate did not reduce pain. Limitations included considerable heterogeneity, poor reporting of randomisation, and possible bias in outcome measures from unblinding of assessors or participants.

conclusionsManual pressure or rhythmic tapping over the injection site and applying local pressure around the injection site reduced IMI pain. However, there was very high unexplained heterogeneity between studies and risk of significant bias within small studies.

Indexed as

HumansInjections, IntramuscularPainPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID33939726
PMCPMC8092782
OpenAlexW3157339413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.