ArticlePloS one2021
Thousands of protein linear motif classes may still be undiscovered.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative phosphoproteomic network analysis identifies CAMK2D as a shared regulator of TPD52 family proteins in cancer.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- Exploiting the endogenous yeast nuclear proteome to identify short linear motifs in vivo.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Article
- Multi-dimensional feature recognition model based on capsule network for ubiquitination site prediction.PeerJ · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linear motifs are short protein subsequences that mediate protein interactions. Hundreds of motif classes including thousands of motif instances are known. Our theory estimates how many motif classes remain undiscovered. As commonly done, we describe motif classes as regular expressions specifying motif length and the allowed amino acids at each motif position. We measure motif specificity for a pair of motif classes by quantifying how many motif-discriminating positions prevent a protein subsequence from matching the two classes at once. We derive theorems for the maximal number of motif classes that can simultaneously maintain a certain number of motif-discriminating positions between all pairs of classes in the motif universe, for a given amino acid alphabet. We also calculate the fraction of all protein subsequences that would belong to a motif class if all potential motif classes came into existence. Naturally occurring pairs of motif classes present most often a single motif-discriminating position. This mild specificity maximizes the potential number of coexisting motif classes, the expansion of the motif universe due to amino acid modifications and the fraction of amino acid sequences that code for a motif instance. As a result, thousands of linear motif classes may remain undiscovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.