Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939695›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Deep template-based protein structure prediction.

Fandi Wu, Jinbo Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Current Approaches in Supersecondary Structures Investigation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Fandi WuToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-3004
Jinbo XuToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7111-4839
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago · US

Funding

New Computational Methods for Data-driven Protein Structure PredictionR01GM089753 · NIGMS · TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE / CHICAGO · PI XU, JINBO · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein structure prediction has been greatly improved by deep learning, but most efforts are devoted to template-free modeling. But very few deep learning methods are developed for TBM (template-based modeling), a popular technique for protein structure prediction. TBM has been studied extensively in the past, but its accuracy is not satisfactory when highly similar templates are not available.

resultsThis paper presents a new method NDThreader (New Deep-learning Threader) to address the challenges of TBM. NDThreader first employs DRNF (deep convolutional residual neural fields), which is an integration of deep ResNet (convolutional residue neural networks) and CRF (conditional random fields), to align a query protein to templates without using any distance information. Then NDThreader uses ADMM (alternating direction method of multipliers) and DRNF to further improve sequence-template alignments by making use of predicted distance potential. Finally, NDThreader builds 3D models from a sequence-template alignment by feeding it and sequence coevolution information into a deep ResNet to predict inter-atom distance distribution, which is then fed into PyRosetta for 3D model construction. Our experimental results show that NDThreader greatly outperforms existing methods such as CNFpred, HHpred, DeepThreader and CEthreader. NDThreader was blindly tested in CASP14 as a part of RaptorX server, which obtained the best average GDT score among all CASP14 servers on the 58 TBM targets.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalProtein ConformationProteinsSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID33939695
PMCPMC8118551
OpenAlexW3159634588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.