Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939692›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Odor sampling strategies in mice with genetically altered olfactory responses.

Johannes Reisert, Glen J Golden, Michele Dibattista, Alan Gelperin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes ReisertMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-9257
Glen J GoldenMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Michele DibattistaDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Alan GelperinPrinceton Neuroscience Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

Molecular BiologyP30DC011735 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI BACHMANOV, ALEXANDER A · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
The Role of CFAP69 in OlfactionR01DC016065 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HAIQING · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
The roles and functions of olfactory transduction channels in the odorant responseR01DC016647 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REISERT, JOHANNES, WANG, HONG · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Dynamic Aspects of Olfactory Signal TransductionR01DC009613 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REISERT, JOHANNES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Improvement to the Animal Facility HVAC System at the Monell Chemical Senses CenterG20OD020296 · OD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2015 to 2015
$498k
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009613NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016065NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016647NIH HHS G20 OD020296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral sensory cells and the central neuronal circuits that monitor environmental changes to drive behaviors should be adapted to match the behaviorally relevant kinetics of incoming stimuli, be it the detection of sound frequencies, the speed of moving objects or local temperature changes. Detection of odorants begins with the activation of olfactory receptor neurons in the nasal cavity following inhalation of air and airborne odorants carried therein. Thus, olfactory receptor neurons are stimulated in a rhythmic and repeated fashion that is determined by the breathing or sniffing frequency that can be controlled and altered by the animal. This raises the question of how the response kinetics of olfactory receptor neurons are matched to the imposed stimulation frequency and if, vice versa, the kinetics of olfactory receptor neuron responses determine the sniffing frequency. We addressed this question by using a mouse model that lacks the K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ exchanger 4 (NCKX4), which results in markedly slowed response termination of olfactory receptor neuron responses and hence changes the temporal response kinetics of these neurons. We monitored sniffing behaviors of freely moving wildtype and NCKX4 knockout mice while they performed olfactory Go/NoGo discrimination tasks. Knockout mice performed with similar or, surprisingly, better accuracy compared to wildtype mice, but chose, depending on the task, different odorant sampling durations depending on the behavioral demands of the odorant identification task. Similarly, depending on the demands of the behavioral task, knockout mice displayed a lower basal breathing frequency prior to odorant sampling, a possible mechanism to increase the dynamic range for changes in sniffing frequency during odorant sampling. Overall, changes in sniffing behavior between wildtype and NCKX4 knockout mice were subtle, suggesting that, at least for the particular odorant-driven task we used, slowed response termination of the odorant-induced receptor neuron response either has a limited detrimental effect on odorant-driven behavior or mice are able to compensate via an as yet unknown mechanism.

Indexed as

Olfactory PerceptionAnimalsAntiportersDiscrimination, PsychologicalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSmellAntiportersSlc24a4 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID33939692
PMCPMC8092659
OpenAlexW3159661546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.