ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2021
Simultaneous Denoising and Localization Network for Photoacoustic Target Localization.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transformer-based optical attenuation compensation and denoising in photoacoustic imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Deep Learning to Localize Photoacoustic Sources in Three Dimensions: Theory and Implementation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Enhancement of instrumented ultrasonic tracking images using deep learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Enhances Multiparametric Dynamic Volumetric Photoacoustic Computed Tomography In Vivo (DL-PACT).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A significant research problem of recent interest is the localization of targets like vessels, surgical needles, and tumors in photoacoustic (PA) images.To achieve accurate localization, a high photoacoustic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is required. However, this is not guaranteed for deep targets, as optical scattering causes an exponential decay in optical fluence with respect to tissue depth. To address this, we develop a novel deep learning method designed to explicitly exhibit robustness to noise present in photoacoustic radio-frequency (RF) data. More precisely, we describe and evaluate a deep neural network architecture consisting of a shared encoder and two parallel decoders. One decoder extracts the target coordinates from the input RF data while the other boosts the SNR and estimates clean RF data. The joint optimization of the shared encoder and dual decoders lends significant noise robustness to the features extracted by the encoder, which in turn enables the network to contain detailed information about deep targets that may be obscured by noise. Additional custom layers and newly proposed regularizers in the training loss function (designed based on observed RF data signal and noise behavior) serve to increase the SNR in the cleaned RF output and improve model performance. To account for depth-dependent strong optical scattering, our network was trained with simulated photoacoustic datasets of targets embedded at different depths inside tissue media of different scattering levels. The network trained on this novel dataset accurately locates targets in experimental PA data that is clinically relevant with respect to the localization of vessels, needles, or brachytherapy seeds. We verify the merits of the proposed architecture by outperforming the state of the art on both simulated and experimental datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.