Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939269›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2021

Mother-infant interactions and infant intake during breastfeeding versus bottle-feeding expressed breast milk.

Alison Ventura, Megan Hupp, Joseph Lavond

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03704051 (Breast Versus Bottle Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03704051 completednot on this map

Breast Versus Bottle Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCalifornia Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoRan2018 to 2021Enrolled94ConditionsBreastfeeding, Bottle FeedingArmsMode of Feeding (breastfeeding versus bottle-feeding)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison VenturaDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2948-4446
Megan HuppDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
Joseph LavondDepartment of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.
California Polytechnic State University · US

Funding

Understanding predictors of overfeeding during infant feedingR03HD096164 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA POLY STATE U SAN LUIS OBISPO · PI VENTURA, ALISON K. · 2018 to 2019
$139k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD096164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bottle-fed infants are at higher risk for rapid weight gain compared with breastfed infants. Few studies have attempted to disentangle effects of feeding mode, milk composition and relevant covariates on feeding interactions and outcomes. The objective of the present study was to compare effects of breastfeeding directly at the breast versus bottle-feeding expressed breast milk on feeding interactions. Mothers with <6-month-old infants (n = 47) participated in two counterbalanced, feeding observations. Mothers breastfed their infants directly from the breast during one visit (breast condition) and bottle-fed their infants expressed breast milk during the other (bottle condition). Masked raters later coded videos using the Nursing Child Assessment Parent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale. Infant intake was assessed. Mothers self-reported sociodemographic characteristics, infant feeding patterns (i.e. percentage of daily feedings from bottles) and level of pressuring feeding style. Mother and infant behaviours were similar during breast and bottle conditions. Percent bottle-feeding moderated effects of condition on intake (P = 0.032): greater percent bottle-feeding predicted greater intake during the bottle compared with breast condition. Effects of feeding mode were not moderated by parity or pressuring feeding style, but, regardless of condition, multiparous mothers fed their infants more than primiparous mothers (P = 0.028), and pressuring feeding style was positively associated with infant intake (P = 0.045). Findings from the present study do not support the hypothesis that feeding mode directly impacts dyadic interaction for predominantly breastfeeding mothers and infants, but rather suggest between-subject differences in feeding experiences and styles predict feeding outcomes for this population.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMilk, HumanBottle FeedingFemaleHumansInfantMother-Child RelationsMothersbottle-feedingbreastfeedingexpressed breast milkinfant feeding practicesmother-infant interactionspressuring feeding stylerapid infant weight gainresponsive feeding stylewithin-subject

Identifiers

PMID33939269
PMCPMC8476436
OpenAlexW3158268159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.