Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939263›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2021

Unsatisfactory quality of E. coli asparaginase biogenerics in India: Implications for clinical outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Jasmeet Sidhu, Manash Pratim Gogoi, Praveen Agarwal, Tathagata Mukherjee, Debparna Saha, Priyanka Bose, Prakriti Roy, Yogesh Phadke, Bhatu Sonawane, Pritha Paul and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Activity and toxicity of intramuscular 1000 iu/mBritish journal of haematology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasmeet SidhuDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-5167
Manash Pratim GogoiTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Praveen AgarwalGennova Vaccine Formulation and Research Centre, Pune, India.
Tathagata MukherjeeGennova Vaccine Formulation and Research Centre, Pune, India.
Debparna SahaTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Priyanka BoseTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Prakriti RoyTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Yogesh PhadkeGennova Vaccine Formulation and Research Centre, Pune, India.
Bhatu SonawaneGennova Vaccine Formulation and Research Centre, Pune, India.
Pritha PaulTata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Vaskar SahaDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2916-9649
Shekhar KrishnanDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6769-3847
Tata Medical Center · INVaccine & Gene Therapy Institute of Florida · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/18/1/503940DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/16/1/503011DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/M/12/1/500261Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe biotherapeutic asparaginase is a cornerstone of therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). With limited access to the original native Escherichia coli-derived asparaginase (EcASNase), a variety of EcASNase biogenerics are used in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). The variable quality of these biogenerics potentially influences clinical outcomes. PROCEDURE: Seven biogeneric EcASNases (P1-P7) marketed widely in India were evaluated, with P2 as an exemplar for in vivo monitoring. Therapeutic activity of P2 (10,000 IU/m

resultsIn patients (N = 62) receiving P2, subtherapeutic asparaginase activity (<100 U/L) was observed in 66% (46/70) of trough timepoints (72 hours postdose) during induction. Twelve patients (19%), 11 with high-risk ALL, developed hypersensitivity. Isoforms of EcASNase were identified in all seven biogenerics. All generic products contained impurities with batch-to-batch variability. These included high levels of protein aggregates and host cell protein contamination. In vitro assays of EcASNase activity and leukaemia cell line cytotoxicity were not discriminatory.

conclusionsOur findings confirm widespread concerns over the unsatisfactory quality and therapeutic activity of native EcASNase biogenerics marketed in LMICs. Appropriate use of these products requires monitored studies to identify clinical suitability and determine appropriate dosing and schedule. For large parts of the world, assured access to high-quality asparaginases remains an unmet therapeutic need.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAsparaginasePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaBiological ProductsDrugs, GenericEscherichia coliHumansIndiaTherapeutic EquivalencyAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginaseBiological ProductsDrugs, Genericasparaginasebiogenericoutcomesquality

Identifiers

PMID33939263
PMCPMC7613163
OpenAlexW3159959318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.