Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939067›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2021

Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase I Study of DSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion in Patients with Advanced Malignancies.

Alexander Spira, Aaron R Hansen, Wael A Harb, Kelly K Curtis, Erina Koga-Yamakawa, Makoto Origuchi, Zhonggai Li, Bella Ertik, Walid L Shaib

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02498665 (A Phase I Clinical Study of DSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion in Adult Patients With Advanced Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02498665 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Clinical Study of DSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion in Adult Patients With Advanced Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorSumitomo Pharma America, Inc.Ran2015 to 2018Enrolled24ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Glioblastoma Multiforme, MelanomaArmsDSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging nanoplatforms towards microenvironment-responsive glioma therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander SpiraVirginia Cancer Specialists, 8503 Arlington Blvd., Suite 400, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA. alexander.spira@usoncology.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-0447
Aaron R HansenDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wael A HarbHorizon Oncology Research, LLC, Lafayette, IN, USA.
Kelly K CurtisMedical Management and Scientific Services, Syneos Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Erina Koga-YamakawaDSP Cancer Institute, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto OriguchiClinical Development, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Zhonggai LiBiostatistics, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Bella ErtikPharmcovigilance, Former Employee of Boston Biomedical, Inc. (Now Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.), Cambridge, MA, USA.
Walid L ShaibDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (United States) · USBoston Biomedical (United States) · USEmory University · USHorizon Oncology Center · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASumitomo Dainippon Pharma (Japan) · JPSyneos Health (United States) · USVirginia Cancer Specialists · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWilms' tumor 1 (WT1) is overexpressed in various malignancies. DSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion, also known as ombipepimut-S (United States Adopted Name; International Nonproprietary Name: adegramotide/nelatimotide), is an investigational therapeutic cancer vaccine comprising two synthetic peptides derived from WT1 to promote both cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) and helper T-lymphocyte-mediated immune responses against WT1-expressing tumors.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to report the results from a phase I dose-escalation study (NCT02498665) that evaluated DSP-7888, administered either intradermally (ID) or subcutaneously (SC), in patients with recurrent or advanced malignancies associated with overexpression of WT1. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this phase I dose-escalation study, patients with recurrent or advanced malignancies associated with overexpression of WT1 who progressed on, were intolerant to, or not a candidate for standard therapy or who presented with a malignancy that had no definite standard therapy received escalating doses of ID or SC DSP-7888 in a rolling-six study design. DSP-7888 3.5, 10.5, or 17.5 (ID only) mg was administered until disease progression or other discontinuation event. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and identification of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Overall survival (OS) and WT1-specific CTL induction were included as secondary and exploratory objectives, respectively.

resultsTwenty-four patients received either ID (3.5 mg, n = 4; 10.5 mg, n = 3; 17.5 mg, n = 3) or SC DSP-7888 (3.5 mg, n = 9; 10.5 mg, n = 5). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was injection site reactions (ID, 100% [10/10]; SC, 35.7% [5/14]); all were grade 1 or 2. Four patients (ID 17.5 mg, n = 1; SC 3.5 mg, n = 1; SC 10.5 mg, n = 2) had stable disease, 16 had progressive disease, and four were not evaluable. Median (95% confidence interval) OS duration was 180.0 (136.0-494.0) days. Among evaluable patients, WT1-specific CTL induction was observed in 66.7% (6/9) and 41.7% (5/12) of those administered ID and SC DSP-7888, respectively.

conclusionsDSP-7888 Dosing Emulsion was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities, in patients with recurrent or advanced malignancies. Higher WT1-specific CTL induction activity was noted with ID compared with SC administration; because of this, the ID route was selected for further evaluation in the clinical program.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02498665.

Indexed as

AgedCancer VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWilms TumorCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33939067
PMCPMC8266707
OpenAlexW3157804315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.