Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33939038›Full record

ReviewCVIR endovascular2021

Adrenal vein sampling: technique and protocol, a systematic review.

Keith B Quencer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CVIR endovascular, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of collection timing on selectivity index in unstimulated adrenal venous sampling: discovery and validation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prospective study of primary aldosteronism in acute ischemic stroke: association with small vessel disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keith B QuencerDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. keith.quencer@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-9739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary aldosteronism is the leading cause of secondary hypertension worldwide. Its deleterious effects outstrip those due to blood pressure elevation alone. An essential part of the work-up of a patient with primary aldosteronism is determining if aldosterone production is unilateral or bilateral. With the former, surgery offers a potential cure and better overall outcomes. Adrenal vein sampling is considered the most reliable method to determine whether production is unilateral or bilateral. Sampling may be non-diagnostic when the vein cannot be properly cannulated. But with proper knowledge and experience as well as the utilization of certain techniques, procedure success can be high. Multiple protocols exist; their rationale and drawbacks are reviewed here. This article will give the reader an overview of techniques for improving procedural success as well as background, rationale and evidence to guide one in choosing the appropriate procedural and interpretation protocol.

Indexed as

Adrenal vein samplingAldosterone producing adenomaCosyntropinPrimary aldosteronism

Identifiers

PMID33939038
PMCPMC8093361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.