ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2021
Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Clinical Classification Method for Gynecomastia Based on Chest Appearance and MR/CT Images.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Invited Commentary: The Case for Nipple Preservation Over Grafts in Gynecomastia Surgery.Annals of plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Innovative Surgical Concept for Simon's Grade IIb Gynecomastia: A Systematic Integration of Circumareolar Mastectomy, Interlocking Suture, Inframammary Fold Detachment, and Waterjet-Assisted Liposuction for Superior Long-term Outcomes.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Article
- Comment to: Is Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Superior to Sonography in Gynecomastia Evaluation and Surgery Planning.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment to: Liposuction Assisted Gynecomastia Surgery with Minimal Periareolar Incision: a Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment to: "A Three-Dimensional Approach to Male Chest Enhancement: A Surgical Algorithm Based on 300 Cases".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Post Bariatric Male Chest Re-Shaping Using L-Shaped Excision Technique.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Patients Decision-Making Characteristics Affects Gynecomastia Treatment Satisfaction: A Multicenter Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecomastia is a common finding in males. Clinical aspect varies widely in world populations showing peculiar hallmarks according to different body shapes reflecting personal expectations; therefore, a surgical plan must be tailored on individual basis to all type of patients. MATERIALS AND
methodA total of 522 patients, treated for bilateral gynecomastia from January 2007 to January 2019, were included and reviewed in this retrospective study. Considering physical status BMI, muscular trophism, hypertrophy of the mammary region, nipple-areola disorder, gland and skin cover consistency, a four-tier classification system has been used to classify the deformity and to assess a surgical plan. In all cases, a subcutaneous mastectomy was performed under direct vision.
resultsNo recurrence of the deformity was observed as well as major complications such as necrosis, and high level of satisfaction was observed in all groups. No breast cancer was found at the histological examinations Operative time ranged from 25 minutes up to 120 minutes and hospitalization time ranged from 1 to 3 days.
conclusionSince the physical status is strictly related to the clinical features of the disorder, a comprehensive classification system and a reconstructive algorithm are proposed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33939025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.