ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusions].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basilar Stenosis Reduces the Impact of Successful Recanalization on Outcome in Basilar Artery Occlusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the publication of the large randomized controlled thrombectomy trials, endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO); however, the treatment of patients with an intracranial occlusion in the posterior circulation and in particular of the basilar artery has not been proven. Thus, there is uncertainty regarding the indications for EVT due to the poor evidence situation.
objectiveThis review article addresses the current data on EVT in the posterior circulation and the most recent study results. Furthermore, the pathophysiological aspects, indications and specific features in the treatment of these patients are also discussed.
resultsDespite limited evidence for EVT, this treatment modality has gained significant clinical relevance for the treatment of stroke patients with vascular occlusions in the posterior circulation. From a technical point of view, vascular occlusions in the posterior circulation and particularly of the basilar artery are easily accessible, although the etiology of occlusions and necessary techniques differ compared to occlusions in the anterior circulation.
conclusionCompared to acLVO, EVT in the posterior circulation differs with respect to the current evidence, indications and technique. As current data have not proven its effectiveness for improved clinical outcome, treatment decisions must still be made individually based on institutional protocols, particularly for patients in the late time window or for patients already with signs of extensive infarction on baseline imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.