Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938938›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Rates of Serious Surgical Errors in California and Plans to Prevent Recurrence.

Andrew J Cohen, Hansen Lui, Micha Zheng, Bhagat Cheema, German Patino, Michael A Kohn, Anthony Enriquez, Benjamin N Breyer

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Never events in plastic surgery: An analysis of surgical burns and medical malpractice litigation.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J CohenJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hansen LuiDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Micha ZhengDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Bhagat CheemaDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
German PatinoDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Michael A KohnDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Anthony EnriquezDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
Benjamin N BreyerDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite widespread recognition and known harms, serious surgical errors, known as surgical never events, endure. The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has developed an oversight system to capture never events and a platform for process improvement that has not yet been critically appraised. Objectives: To examine surgical never events occurring in hospitals in California and summarize recommendations to prevent future events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study identified 386 CDPH hospital administrative penalty reports, of which 142 were ascribable to never events occurring during surgery. These never events were identified and summarized from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. A directed qualitative approach was used to analyze CDPH-mandated corrective steps to reduce future errors in this multicenter study of all accredited hospitals in California. Inclusion of surgical never event records was based on definitions established by the US Department of Health and Human Services National Quality Forum. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2019, to November 30, 2020. Exposures: Never events include death or disability of an American Society of Anesthesiologists class I patient, wrong site or wrong surgery, retained foreign objects, burns, equipment failure leading to intraoperative injury, nonapproved experimental procedures, insufficient surgeon presence or privileges, or fall from the operating room table. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident rates, consequences, and improvement plans to prevent additional never events were outcomes of interest. Results: A total of 142 never events were reported to the CDPH (1 per 200 000 operations). Annual surgical volume for hospitals with events was 9203 vs 3251 cases for hospitals without events (P < .001). A total of 94 of 142 events (66.2%) were retained foreign objects ranging from Kocher clamps to drain sponges. Wrong site or patient surgery accounted for 22 events (15.5%), surgical burns for 11 (7.7%), and other for 15 (10.6%). Other included insufficient surgeon presence, equipment failure, or falls in the operating room. Improvement plans included 18 unique categories of recommendations from regulators, many focusing on proper use of checklists. Regulators mandated a mean (SD) of 13 (7) corrective actions in the improvement plans. Policy adherence monitoring (119 [90.2%]), revision of existing policy (84 [63.6%]), and education regarding policy (83 [62.9%]) were common action items, whereas disciplinary action toward staff was rare (11 [8.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical never events are a rare issue in California. Numerous strategies have evolved to reduce errors, many involving the thorough and proper use of intraoperative checklists.

Indexed as

CaliforniaChecklistCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospital AdministrationHospitalsHumansMaleMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID33938938
PMCPMC8094010
OpenAlexW3159405561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.