Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938808›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

The Uptake and Use of Telemonitoring in Chronic Care Between 2014 and 2019: Nationwide Survey Among Patients and Health Care Professionals in the Netherlands.

Martine W J Huygens, Helene R Voogdt-Pruis, Myrah Wouters, Maaike M Meurs, Britt van Lettow, Conchita Kleijweg, Roland D Friele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digital Health Use Across Socioeconomic Groups Among Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martine W J HuygensNIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-1399
Helene R Voogdt-Pruis *Department of Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-3897
Myrah WoutersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7418-9833
Maaike M MeursNIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5054-5231
Britt van LettowNictiz, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-6860
Conchita KleijwegNictiz, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-1736
Roland D FrieleNIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5602-826X
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLNationaal ICT Instituut in de Zorg · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemonitoring could offer solutions to the mounting challenges for health care and could improve patient self-management. Studies have addressed the benefits and challenges of telemonitoring for certain patient groups.

objectiveThis paper will examine the nationwide uptake of telemonitoring in chronic care in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019 by means of an annual representative survey among patients and health care professionals.

methodsBetween 2014 and 2019, approximately 2900 patients with chronic diseases, 700 nurses, and 500 general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists received a questionnaire. About 30 questions addressed topics about the use of eHealth and experiences with it, including data about telemonitoring.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2019, the use of telemonitoring remained stable for all groups except medical specialists. In medical specialist departments, the use of telemonitoring increased from 11.2% (18/161) in 2014 to 19.6% (36/184) in 2019 (χ

conclusionsThe uptake of telemonitoring in Dutch chronic care remained stable during 2014-2019 but increased among medical specialists. According to both patients and professionals, telemonitoring improves the quality of life and quality of care. Skills for suitably including eligible patients and for allocating the tasks of data monitoring and follow-up care within the team would help to further increase the use of telemonitoring.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineAgedHealth PersonnelHumansNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnaireseHealthself-managementtelehealthtelemedicinetelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID33938808
PMCPMC8129877
OpenAlexW3157344523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.