Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938652›Full record

ArticleCroatian medical journal2021

The effect of parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies at the age of 40 and above: a retrospective study.

Simten Genc, Cagdas N Emeklioglu, Basak Cingillioglu, Erhan Akturk, H Turhan Ozkan, Veli Mihmanlı

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Croatian medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simten GencSimten Genc, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34384, Turkey, simtengenc@yahoo.com.tr.
Cagdas N Emeklioglu
Basak Cingillioglu
Erhan Akturk
H Turhan Ozkan
Veli Mihmanlı
Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the characteristics of pregnancies at a very advanced maternal age and the effect of parity on adverse obstetric outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of women who gave birth at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital between January 2012 and December 2019. Overall, 22 448 of women were younger than 40 and 593 were aged 40 and older. Women aged 40 and older were divided into the primiparous (52 or 8.77%) and multiparous group (541 or 91.23%).

resultsSignificantly more women aged 40 and older had a cesarean section. The most common indications for a secondary cesarean delivery in both age groups were a previous cesarean procedure or uterine operation. The most frequent indication for primary cesarean section in both groups was fetal distress. Cesarean section rates due to non-progressive labor, fetal distress, and preeclampsia were significantly more frequent in primiparous women compared with multiparous women aged 40 and older. In primiparous women, fetal birth weight was lower and preeclampsia/gestational hypertension frequency were higher.

conclusionSince primiparity was a risk factor for lower fetal birth weight and preeclampsia/gestational hypertension in the age group of 40 years and above, more attention should be paid to the follow-up and treatment of these patients.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansMaternal AgeMiddle AgedParityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33938652
PMCPMC8107994
OpenAlexW3158383748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.