Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938597›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Priorities and preferences for care of people with multiple chronic conditions.

Mieke Rijken, René Stüssgen, Chantal Leemrijse, Mieke J L Bogerd, Joke C Korevaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Priorities and preferences for care of people with multiple chronic conditions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mieke RijkenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6070-4091
René StüssgenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chantal LeemrijseNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mieke J L BogerdDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joke C KorevaarNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLAmsterdam Public Health · NLNational Health Care Institute · NLUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo guide the development of high-quality care for people with multiple chronic conditions, partners of the European Joint Action CHRODIS developed the Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model. To assess its suitability for improving care for people with multimorbidity in the Netherlands, the model was piloted in a primary care setting with both patients and care providers.

aimThis paper reports on the patient perspective, and aims to explore the priorities, underlying values and preferences for care of people with multimorbidity. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsTwenty persons with multimorbidity (selected from general practice registries) participated in a focus group or telephone interview. Subsequently, a questionnaire was completed by 863 persons with multimorbidity registered with 14 general practices. Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data by means of descriptive statistics.

resultsFrequently prioritized elements of care were the use of shared electronic health records, regular comprehensive assessments, self-management support and shared decision making, and care coordination. Preferences for how these elements should be specifically addressed differed according to individual values (eg weighing safety against privacy) and needs (eg ways of coping with multimorbidity).

conclusionThe JA-CHRODIS Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model reflects the priorities and preferences for care of people with multimorbidity in the Netherlands, which supports its relevance to guide the development of person-centred integrated care for people with multiple chronic conditions in the Netherlands. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: European patient experts contributed to the development and applicability assessment of the JA-CHRODIS Integrated Multimorbidity Care Model; Dutch patients participated in focus groups, interviews and a survey.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsSelf-ManagementHumansMultimorbidityPrimary Health CareSurveys and Questionnairesdelivery of health carehealth prioritiesintegratedmultiple chronic conditionspatient preferenceprimary health carequalitative researchsurvey

Identifiers

PMID33938597
PMCPMC8369115
OpenAlexW3157447463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.