ArticleAIDS care2022
Understanding and addressing privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with the provision of mobile HIV care: a qualitative study.
Article in AIDS care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Remote Intervention Based on mHealth and Community Health Workers for Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in People With HIV: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Addressing Stigma and Privacy Through Telemedicine: Qualitative Findings on Enhancing HIV Care Engagement Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Phylodynamics analysis of HIV epidemic history in Belarus in 1987-2022.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Article
- Lived Experiences of Adolescents with HIV in Rwanda: A Phenomenology Study.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024Article
- Clinic-level complexities prevent effective engagement of people living with HIV who are out-of-care.PloS one · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Correlates of HIV Disclosure Without Consent Among Women Living With HIV in Metro Vancouver, Canada.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2023Article
- Reaching and Re-Engaging People Living with HIV Who Are Out of Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Patient Preferences for Strategies to Enhance Clinic Communication and Outreach.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Less than half the people with HIV (PLWH) in the United States (US) are retained in HIV care, underscoring the importance of novel reengagement and retention strategies. Mobile HIV clinics (MHCs) are one such strategy, but privacy and confidentiality concerns have limited their use. As part of a larger mixed-methods study in Atlanta, Georgia, from June 2019- July 2020, we conducted 41 qualitative interviews with key stakeholders to explore confidentiality, privacy and stigma concerns and strategies to address them. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded thematically. Four key themes emerged: 1) the need to understand MHC acceptance in the context of high HIV stigma in the South, 2) the multidimensionality of confidentiality and stigma concerns (e.g., related to exterior labeling, layout, location attracting unwanted attention), 3) the counter perspective: potential for MHCs to positively reframe HIV and reduce stigma, and 4) strategies to overcome stigma and confidentiality concerns, including co-delivery of non-HIV services, unidirectional flow, and non-HIV exterior labeling. In furthering understanding of the breadth of privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with an MHC and strategies for addressing them, this exploratory study lays a critical foundation for the development of an MHC to reengage and retain PLWH in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.