Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938301›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2021

Variation in use of Caesarean section in Norway: An application of spatio-temporal Gaussian random fields.

Janne Mannseth, Geir D Berentsen, Hans J Skaug, Rolv T Lie, Dag Moster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janne MannsethDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1386-5073
Geir D BerentsenDepartment of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics, Norway.
Hans J SkaugDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway.
Rolv T LieDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Dag MosterDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCaesarean section (CS) is a medical intervention performed in Norway when a surgical delivery is considered more beneficial than a vaginal. Because deliveries with higher risk are centralized to larger hospitals, use of CS varies considerably between hospitals. We describe how the use of CS varies geographically by municipality. Since indications for CS should have little variation across the relatively homogenous population of Norway, we expect fair use of CS to be evenly distributed across the municipalities.

methodsData from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway were used in our analyses (810,914 total deliveries, 133,746 CSs, 440 municipalities). We propose a spatial correlation model that takes the location into account to describe the variation in use of CS across the municipalities. The R packages R-INLA and TMB are used to estimate the yearly municipal CS rate and the spatial correlation between the municipalities. We also apply stratified models for different categories of delivering women (Robson groups). Estimated rates are displayed in maps and model parameters are shown in tables.

resultsThe CS rate varies substantially between the different municipalities. As expected, there was strong correlation between neighbouring municipalities. Similar results were found for different Robson groups.

conclusionsThe substantial difference in CS use across municipalities in Norway is not likely to be due to specific medical reasons, but rather to hospitals' different policies towards the use of CS. The policy to be either more or less restrictive to CS was not specific to any category of deliveries.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHospitalsFemaleHumansNorwayPregnancyCaesarean sectiongeographical variationINLASpatial correlationSPDETMB

Identifiers

PMID33938301
PMCPMC8573683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.