Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938278›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Was Cinderella just a fairy tale? Survival differences between stepchildren and their half-siblings.

Ryan Schacht, Huong Meeks, Alison Fraser, Ken R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adoption, Fostering, and Parental Absence in Vanuatu.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  3. COVID-19 mortality in Brazil, 2020-21: consequences of the pandemic inadequate management.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  4. The differential role of practical and emotional support in infant feeding experience in the UK.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Who cares for women with children? Crossing the bridge between disciplines.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Paternal Filicide in Sweden: Background, Risk Factors and the Cinderella Effect.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan SchachtDepartment of Anthropology, East Carolina University, Greenville 27858, USA.
Huong MeeksPopulation Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 20270, USA.
Alison FraserPopulation Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 20270, USA.
Ken R SmithPopulation Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 20270, USA.

Funding

The Utah Study of Fertility, Longevity and AgingR01AG022095 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SMITH, KEN R · 2003 to 2015
$9.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The death of a parent, particularly the mother, is linked to a suite of negative outcomes across the life-course. Compounding concerns for child outcomes are expectations of poor treatment by step-parents after parental remarriage. Indeed, folk tales of step-parental abuse abound cross-culturally and are embedded into stories taught to children. To understand why child outcomes might be sensitive to levels of relatedness within the household, evolutionary-oriented research targets patterning in parental expenditure in ways predicted to maximize inclusive fitness. In particular, parents are expected to prioritize investments in their biological children. However, stepfamilies are only formed after children experience multiple unfortunate events (e.g. parental loss, poverty), blurring causal interpretations between step-parental presence and stepchild outcomes. Moreover, stepchildren have been shown to be integral to household functioning, caring for their half-siblings and stabilizing relationships. These results challenge narrow views of adaptive behaviour; specifically, that step-parents, unlike biological parents, do no stand to reap fitness benefits from the care that they provide to their stepchildren. To evaluate these critiques, we analyse the survival outcomes of stepchildren. We include over 400 000 individuals from across a natural fertility period (1847-1940) in the United States state of Utah and examine the consequences of parental loss and step-parental introduction. Our analyses yield three key results: (i) exposure to maternal loss in childhood is associated with elevated mortality risk, (ii) parental remarriage does not increase the risk of mortality among stepchildren compared to non-stepchildren who too had lost a parent, and (iii) stepchildren enjoy higher survival than their half-siblings within the same family. Ultimately, this work contributes to the increasingly recognized importance of cooperative relationships among non-kin for childcare and household functioning. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal-child health'.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsSocial SupportAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFathersFemaleHumansInfantMaleMarriageMortalityMothersSiblingsUtahchild mortalityCinderella effectfamily demographyparental investmentstepfamilies

Identifiers

PMID33938278
PMCPMC8090814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.