Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33938166›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

Beyond the single average tumor: Understanding IO combinations using a clinical QSP model that incorporates heterogeneity in patient response.

Rukmini Kumar, Kannan Thiagarajan, Lakshmanan Jagannathan, Liming Liu, Kapil Mayawala, Dinesh de Alwis, Brian Topp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rukmini KumarVantage Research LLC, Delaware City, Delaware, USA.
Kannan ThiagarajanVantage Research Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, India.
Lakshmanan JagannathanVantage Research Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, India.
Liming LiuMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Kapil MayawalaMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Dinesh de AlwisMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Brian ToppMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative systems pharmacology model for metastatic melanoma was developed for immuno-oncology with the goal of predicting efficacy of combination checkpoint therapy with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. This literature-based model is developed at multiple scales: (i) tumor and immune cell interactions at a lesion level; (ii) multiple heterogeneous target lesions, nontarget lesion growth, and appearance of new metastatic lesion at a patient level; and (iii) interpatient differences at a population level. The model was calibrated to pembrolizumab and ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with melanoma from Robert et al., specifically, waterfall plot showing target lesion response and overall response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1), which additionally considers nontarget lesion growth and appearance of new metastatic lesions. We then used the model to predict waterfall and RECIST version 1.1 for combination treatment reported in Long et al. A key insight from this work was that nontarget lesions growth and appearance of new metastatic lesion contributed significantly to disease progression, despite reduction in target lesions. Further, the lesion level simulations of combination therapy show substantial efficacy in warm lesions (intermediary immunogenicity) but limited advantage of combination in both cold and hot lesions (low and high immunogenicity). Because many patients with metastatic disease are expected to have a mixture of these lesions, disease progression in such patients may be driven by a subset of cold lesions that are unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors. These patients may benefit more from the combinations which include therapies to target cold lesions than double checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansIpilimumabMelanomaNetwork PharmacologyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIpilimumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID33938166
PMCPMC8302246
OpenAlexW3158919458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.