ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2021
Protein folding - seeing is deceiving.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The master molecule that built biology: How water shaped the chemistry of life.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
- Cis-Acting Chaperoning by Macromolecular Tethering: A Built-In Layer of Cellular Chaperoning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Arch from the Stones: Understanding Protein Folding Energy Landscapes via Bioinspired Collective Variables.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Statistical Thermodynamics of the Protein Ensemble: Mediating Function and Evolution.Annual review of biophysics · 2025Review
- Impact of local unfolding fluctuations on the evolution of regional sequence preferences in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Beyond Misfolding: A New Paradigm for the Relationship Between Protein Folding and Aggregation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- On the Stabilizing Effect of Aspartate and Glutamate and Its Counteraction by Common Denaturants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A Tale of Two Chains: Geometries of a Chain Model and Protein Native State Structures.Polymers · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Medicinal Chemistry: The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Early Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Rethinking the protein folding problem from a new perspective.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- DMSO-Quenched H/D-Exchange 2D NMR Spectroscopy and Its Applications in Protein Science.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Some Clues about Enzymes from Psychrophilic Microorganisms.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Decoding an Amino Acid Sequence to Extract Information on Protein Folding.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- From Protein Design to the Energy Landscape of a Cold Unfolding Protein.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Structure‒function‒pathogenicity analysis of C-terminal myocilin missense variants based on experiments and 3D models.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Water's Variable Role in Protein Stability Uncovered by Liquid-Observed Vapor Exchange NMR.Biochemistry · 2021Article
- Protein folding - seeing is deceiving.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Cellular Protein Folding, Misfolding and Aggregation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Local sequence-structure relationships in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation. Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical-chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat nonspecific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization. Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α-helices and strands of β-sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen-bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of "frustration" is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved. Putting the "bottom line" at the top: it is likely that hydrogen-bond satisfaction represents a largely under-appreciated parameter in protein folding models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.