Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937977›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2021

Development of a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure for measuring symptoms and appearance in vascular malformations: the OVAMA questionnaire.

M M Lokhorst, S E R Horbach, D A Young-Afat, M L E Stor, L Haverman, P I Spuls, C M A M van der Horst, OVAMA Steering Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeted medical therapies for vascular anomalies.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeted treatment of vascular anomalies.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M M LokhorstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-9195
S E R HorbachDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D A Young-AfatDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M L E StorDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
L HavermanPsychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P I SpulsDepartment of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C M A M van der HorstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
OVAMA Steering Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe symptoms and appearance of vascular malformations can severely harm a patient's quality of life. The aim of treatment of vascular malformations generally is to improve condition-specific symptoms and/or appearance. Therefore, it is highly important to start testing treatment effects in clinical studies from the patient's perspective.

objectivesTo develop a patient-reported outcome measure for measuring symptoms and appearance in patients with vascular malformations.

methodsA first draft of the patient-reported outcome measure was based on the previously internationally developed core outcome set. The qualitative part of this study involved interviews with 14 patients, which led to a second draft. The second draft was field tested cross-sectionally, after which groups of items were evaluated for adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0·7) to form composite scores. Construct validity was evaluated by testing 13 predefined hypotheses on known-group differences.

resultsThe patient interviews ensured adequate content validity and resulted in a general symptom scale with six items, a head and neck symptom scale with eight items, and an appearance scale with nine items. Cronbach's alpha was adequate for two composite scores: a general symptom score (0·88) and an appearance score (0·85). Ten out of 13 hypotheses on known-group differences were confirmed, confirming adequate construct validity.

conclusionsWith the development of the OVAMA questionnaire, outcomes of patients with vascular malformations can now be evaluated from the patient's perspective. This may help improve the development of evidence-based treatments and the overall care for patients with vascular malformations.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeVascular MalformationsHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33937977
PMCPMC8518089
OpenAlexW3157041483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.