ArticleDysphagia2022
Detecting Aspiration During FEES with Narrow Band Imaging in a Clinical Setting.
Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of filter-based and software-based image enhancement systems for endoscopic swallowing diagnostics: a head-to-head study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- AI-Based Detection of Aspiration for Video-Endoscopy with Visual Aids in Meaningful Frames to Interpret the Model Outcome.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of narrow band imaging (NBI) during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is recognised as an emerging technology to improve the contrast of the test fluid during endoscopic dysphagia evaluation. This study tested the hypothesis that the use of NBI in FEES would improve the detection of laryngeal penetration and aspiration in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis/paresis (UVFP), a typically difficult population in which to detect the presence of aspiration with FEES. Twenty-one consecutive outpatients with UVFP were evaluated with FEES using white light (WL) and NBI under 150 test conditions (75 WL & 75 NBI). Three speech pathologists, highly experienced in FEES using WL but novices to using NBI, rated laryngeal penetration and aspiration for green dyed thin fluid (5 ml and 90 ml) and mildly thick fluid (5 ml) milk, and were compared to two raters more experienced in using NBI during FEES. Laryngeal penetration and aspiration were significantly higher for larger volumes (90 ml) (p < 0.05). With NBI-naïve raters, there was a trend towards lower intra-rater and inter-rater reliability compared to WL on all bolus trials reaching significance on mildly thick fluid (p < 0.01). There was lower rater confidence when using NBI compared to WL in NBI-naïve raters to detect aspiration (p < 0.01). Sensitivity was lower regardless of NBI experience; 80.77-84.21% with WL compared to 46.15-50.00% with NBI. Findings indicate that the improved contrast of a dyed opaque milk trial under WL may negate the potential benefits of using NBI to increase the contrast of the test fluid and supports the use of an opaque test fluid such as milk. NBI may also not be as useful to clinicians with no experience with the altered light condition, and can result in lower sensitivity in even the experienced user.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.