Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937938›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Detecting Aspiration During FEES with Narrow Band Imaging in a Clinical Setting.

Claire Stanley, Paul Paddle, Susie Griffiths, Adnan Safdar, Debra Phyland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of filter-based and software-based image enhancement systems for endoscopic swallowing diagnostics: a head-to-head study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire StanleyDepartment of Otolaryngology; Head & Neck Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. claire.stanley@monashhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-1630
Paul PaddleDepartment of Otolaryngology; Head & Neck Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Susie GriffithsDepartment of Otolaryngology; Head & Neck Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Adnan SafdarDepartment of Otolaryngology; Head & Neck Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Debra PhylandDepartment of Otolaryngology; Head & Neck Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of narrow band imaging (NBI) during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is recognised as an emerging technology to improve the contrast of the test fluid during endoscopic dysphagia evaluation. This study tested the hypothesis that the use of NBI in FEES would improve the detection of laryngeal penetration and aspiration in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis/paresis (UVFP), a typically difficult population in which to detect the presence of aspiration with FEES. Twenty-one consecutive outpatients with UVFP were evaluated with FEES using white light (WL) and NBI under 150 test conditions (75 WL & 75 NBI). Three speech pathologists, highly experienced in FEES using WL but novices to using NBI, rated laryngeal penetration and aspiration for green dyed thin fluid (5 ml and 90 ml) and mildly thick fluid (5 ml) milk, and were compared to two raters more experienced in using NBI during FEES. Laryngeal penetration and aspiration were significantly higher for larger volumes (90 ml) (p < 0.05). With NBI-naïve raters, there was a trend towards lower intra-rater and inter-rater reliability compared to WL on all bolus trials reaching significance on mildly thick fluid (p < 0.01). There was lower rater confidence when using NBI compared to WL in NBI-naïve raters to detect aspiration (p < 0.01). Sensitivity was lower regardless of NBI experience; 80.77-84.21% with WL compared to 46.15-50.00% with NBI. Findings indicate that the improved contrast of a dyed opaque milk trial under WL may negate the potential benefits of using NBI to increase the contrast of the test fluid and supports the use of an opaque test fluid such as milk. NBI may also not be as useful to clinicians with no experience with the altered light condition, and can result in lower sensitivity in even the experienced user.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersColoring AgentsEndoscopesHumansNarrow Band ImagingReproducibility of ResultsColoring AgentsAspirationDeglutitionDeglutition disordersFEESNarrow band imagingUnilateral vocal fold paralysis

Identifiers

PMID33937938
OpenAlexW3157581035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.