ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2021
Non-selective COX inhibitors impair memory formation and short-term but not long-term synaptic plasticity.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic implications of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors in ischemic injury.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclooxygenase (COX) plays a critical role in synaptic plasticity. Therefore, long-term administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and its main metabolite, salicylate, as a COX inhibitor may impair synaptic plasticity and subsequently memory formation. Although different studies have tried to explain the effects of ASA and sodium salicylate (SS) on learning and memory, the results are contradictory and the mechanisms are not exactly known. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of long-term low-dose (equivalent to prophylactic dose) and short-term high-dose (equivalent to analgesic dose) administration of ASA and SS respectively, on spatial learning and memory and hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Animals were treated with a low dose of ASA (2 mg/ml solvated in drinking water, 6 weeks) or a high dose of SS, a metabolite of ASA, (300 mg/kg, 3 days, twice-daily, i.p). Spatial memory and synaptic plasticity were assessed by water maze performance and in vivo field potential recording from CA1, respectively. Animals treated with ASA but not SS showed a significant increase in escape latency and distance moved. Furthermore, in the probe test, animals treated with both drugs spent less time in the target quadrant zone. The paired-pulse ratio (PPR) at 20-ms inter-pulse intervals (IPI) as an index of short-term plasticity in both treated groups was significantly higher than of the control group. Interestingly, none of the administered drugs affected long-term potentiation (LTP). These data suggested that long-term inhibition of COX disrupted memory acquisition and retrieval. Interestingly, cognitive impairments happened along with short-term but not long-term synaptic plasticity disturbance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.