ArticleEJVES vascular forum2020
Can a Peritoneal Conduit Become an Artery?
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCurrent vascular grafts all have limitations. This study examined peritoneum as a potential graft material and the
methodsPeritoneum with adherent rectus aponeurosis from sheep was used to form tubular vascular grafts that were implanted into the common carotid artery of six sheep, then removed after five months. Two sheep received allogenic peritoneal grafts and four sheep received autologous peritoneal grafts.
resultsOne sheep died shortly after implantation, so five of the six sheep were followed. Five months after implantation, four of the five remaining grafts were patent. Three of four patent grafts were aneurysmal. The four patent grafts had developed an endothelial layer indistinguishable from that of the adjacent normal artery, and a medial layer with smooth muscle cells with a surrounding adventitia. The new conduit displayed vasomotor function not present at the time of implantation. DNA genotyping showed that the media in the new conduit consisted of recipient smooth muscle cells. Little difference in mRNA expression was demonstrated between the post-implantation conduit and normal artery.
conclusionDuring a five month implantation period in the arterial system, peritoneum converted into a tissue that histologically and functionally resembled a normal artery, with a functional genetic expression that resembled that of an artery. Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis indicated that this conversion occurs through host cell migration into the graft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.