ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2021
Deep Learning-based Automated Segmentation of Left Ventricular Trabeculations and Myocardium on Cardiac MR Images: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- How should we interpret excessive left ventricular trabeculation? Update on controversies from the cardiac imaging perspective.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning for cardiac MRI: performance evidence and barriers to clinical integration. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Improved and Automated Detection of Papillary Muscle Infarction Using Joint Bright- and Black-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Cine cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation using temporal-spatial adaptation of prompt-enabled segment-anything-model: a feasibility study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning Pipeline for Assessing Ventricular Volumes from a Cardiac MRI Registry of Patients with Single Ventricle Physiology.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Anatomical Prior-Based Automatic Segmentation for Cardiac Substructures from Computed Tomography Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Papillary-Muscle-Derived Radiomic Features for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy versus Hypertensive Heart Disease Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fully automated intracardiac 4D flow MRI post-processing using deep learning for biventricular segmentation.European radiology · 2022Article
- Open-source pre-clinical image segmentation: mouse cardiac magnetic resonance imaging datasets with a deep learning segmentation framework.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a complete deep learning pipeline that allows fully automated end-diastolic left ventricle (LV) cardiac MRI segmentation, including trabeculations and automatic quality control of the predicted segmentation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study includes training, validation, and testing datasets of 272, 27, and 150 cardiac MR images, respectively, collected between 2012 and 2018. The reference standard was the manual segmentation of four LV anatomic structures performed on end-diastolic short-axis cine cardiac MRI: LV trabeculations, LV myocardium, LV papillary muscles, and the LV blood cavity. The automatic pipeline was composed of five steps with a DenseNet architecture. Intraobserver agreement, interobserver agreement, and interaction time were recorded. The analysis includes the correlation between the manual and automated segmentation, a reproducibility comparison, and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsThe automated method achieved mean Dice coefficients of 0.96 ± 0.01 (standard deviation) for LV blood cavity, 0.89 ± 0.03 for LV myocardium, and 0.62 ± 0.08 for LV trabeculation (mean absolute error, 3.63 g ± 3.4). Automatic quantification of LV end-diastolic volume, LV myocardium mass, LV trabeculation, and trabeculation mass-to-total myocardial mass (TMM) ratio showed a significant correlation with the manual measures (
conclusionAutomated deep learning framework can achieve reproducible and quality-controlled segmentation of cardiac trabeculations, outperforming inter- and intraobserver analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.