Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937846›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2020

The State of Radiology AI: Considerations for Purchase Decisions and Current Market Offerings.

Yasasvi Tadavarthi, Brianna Vey, Elizabeth Krupinski, Adam Prater, Judy Gichoya, Nabile Safdar, Hari Trivedi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Practical applications of AI in body imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasasvi TadavarthiDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-0387-2299
Brianna VeyDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-8425-0514
Elizabeth KrupinskiDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).
Adam PraterDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-9334-1688
Judy GichoyaDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-1097-316X
Nabile SafdarDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-1131-8052
Hari TrivediDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 (Y.T.); and Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (B.V., E.K., A.P., J.G., N.S., H.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-6648-8334
Augusta University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide an overview of important factors to consider when purchasing radiology artificial intelligence (AI) software and current software offerings by type, subspecialty, and modality. MATERIALS AND

methodsImportant factors for consideration when purchasing AI software, including key decision makers, data ownership and privacy, cost structures, performance indicators, and potential return on investment are described. For the market overview, a list of radiology AI companies was aggregated from the Radiological Society of North America and the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine conferences (November 2016-June 2019), then narrowed to companies using deep learning for imaging analysis and diagnosis. Software created for image enhancement, reporting, or workflow management was excluded. Software was categorized by task (repetitive, quantitative, explorative, and diagnostic), modality, and subspecialty.

resultsA total of 119 software offerings from 55 companies were identified. There were 46 algorithms that currently have Food and Drug Administration and/or Conformité Européenne approval (as of November 2019). Of the 119 offerings, distribution of software targets was 34 of 70 (49%), 21 of 70 (30%), 14 of 70 (20%), and one of 70 (1%) for diagnostic, quantitative, repetitive, and explorative tasks, respectively. A plurality of companies are focused on nodule detection at chest CT and two-dimensional mammography. There is very little activity in certain subspecialties, including pediatrics and nuclear medicine. A comprehensive table is available on the website

conclusionThe radiology AI marketplace is rapidly maturing, with an increase in product offerings. Radiologists and practice administrators should educate themselves on current product offerings and important factors to consider before purchase and implementation.© RSNA, 2020See also the invited commentary by Sala and Ursprung in this issue.

Identifiers

PMID33937846
PMCPMC8082344
OpenAlexW3099217180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.