Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937817›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2020

Attention-Aware Discrimination for MR-to-CT Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks.

Vasant Kearney, Benjamin P Ziemer, Alan Perry, Tianqi Wang, Jason W Chan, Lijun Ma, Olivier Morin, Sue S Yom, Timothy D Solberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Turning brain MRI into diagnostic PET:Medical image analysis · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vasant KearneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.ORCID 0000-0003-3446-1561
Benjamin P ZiemerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Alan PerryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Tianqi WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Jason W ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Lijun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Olivier MorinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-5704
Sue S YomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-7476
Timothy D SolbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1600 Divisidero St, San Francisco, CA 94115.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo suggest an attention-aware, cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (A-CycleGAN) enhanced with variational autoencoding (VAE) as a superior alternative to current state-of-the-art MR-to-CT image translation methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn attention-gating mechanism is incorporated into a discriminator network to encourage a more parsimonious use of network parameters, whereas VAE enhancement enables deeper discrimination architectures without inhibiting model convergence. Findings from 60 patients with head, neck, and brain cancer were used to train and validate A-CycleGAN, and findings from 30 patients were used for the holdout test set and were used to report final evaluation metric results using mean absolute error (MAE) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR).

resultsA-CycleGAN achieved superior results compared with U-Net, a generative adversarial network (GAN), and a cycle-consistent GAN. The A-CycleGAN averages, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Wilcoxon signed-rank two-sided test statistics are shown for MAE (19.61 [95% CI: 18.83, 20.39],

conclusionA-CycleGANs were a superior alternative to state-of-the-art MR-to-CT image translation methods.© RSNA, 2020.

Identifiers

PMID33937817
PMCPMC8017410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.