Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937684›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2020

Managing bone loss in open fractures.

Andrew Adamczyk, Bradley Meulenkamp, Geoffrey Wilken, Steven Papp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The masquelet technique for severe open fractures: current insights.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current concepts of bone grafting in trauma surgery.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew AdamczykThe Ottawa Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Bradley MeulenkampThe Ottawa Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Geoffrey WilkenThe Ottawa Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Steven PappThe Ottawa Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental bone loss continues to pose substantial clinical and technical challenges to orthopaedic surgeons. While several surgical options exist for the treatment of these complex patients, there is not a clear consensus or specific guidelines on the optimal management of these injuries as a whole. Many factors must be taken into consideration when planning surgery for these individuals. In order for these techniques to yield optimal results, each injury must be approached in a step-wise and multidisciplinary fashion to ensure that care is taken in bone and wound bed preparation, that soft tissues are healthy and free of contaminants, and that the patient's medical condition has been optimized. Through this article, we will answer relevant questions and discuss common obstacles and challenges encountered with these complex injuries. We will also review the many treatment options available or in development to address this problem.

Indexed as

bone losslower extremity fractureopen fracture

Identifiers

PMID33937684
PMCPMC8081484
OpenAlexW3015066448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.