Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937680›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2020

Hardware considerations in infection and nonunion management: When and how to revise the fixation.

Graeme Hoit, Marissa Bonyun, Aaron Nauth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fracture related infection (FRI) of the upper extremity correlates with poor bone and soft tissue healing.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of aseptic nonunions and severe bone defects: let us get this thing healed!OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graeme HoitDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto.
Marissa BonyunDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto.
Aaron NauthDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of both nonunion and fracture-related infection provides challenges for both the patient and the treating orthopaedic surgeon, with the potential need for complex reconstructive procedures to achieve union and/or eradicate infection. In addition to addressing the multiple different factors that often contribute to nonunion, surgeons are often forced to deal with difficult hardware issues at the time of revision surgery including infected hardware, loose or failing hardware, malaligned hardware, or inappropriate hardware constructs. This article reviews common causes of nonunions with emphasis on infection management and provides indications and techniques for hardware removal in the context of an algorithmic approach to nonunion management with illustrative case examples.

Indexed as

broken hardwarefracture healingfracture nonunionfracture-related infectionfracture revisionhardware removalinfectionmetabolic causes of nonunionnonunionorthopaedic trauma

Identifiers

PMID33937680
PMCPMC8081462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.