ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2019
Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Recovery Coaching and the National Disability Insurance Scheme: Outcomes and their Alignment with the CHIME-D Recovery Framework.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Mental health resources for orthopaedic trauma patient care: a survey of orthopaedic trauma association members.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025Article
- Trauma Survivors Network: history and evolution of a program empowering survivors and families impacted by traumatic injury.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- Characterizing a Common Phenomenon: Why do Trauma Patients Re-present to the Emergency Department?The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- CORR Insights®: Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Existing Online Patient Navigation Interventions: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Follow-up after major traumatic injury: a survey of services in Australian and New Zealand public hospitals.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Post-Trauma Discharge Instructions: Are We Dropping the Ball?The American surgeon · 2023Review
- Recidivism after orthopaedic trauma has diminished over time.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Trauma-informed care: recognizing and resisting re-traumatization in health care.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify resources that patients perceive as helpful to their recovery and to characterize the impact of the Trauma Survivor Network (TSN), a program committed to enhancing recovery through education and engagement.
designProspective cohort study.
settingLevel 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/
participantsFour hundred eighty-five patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Two hundred eleven were exposed to TSN resources (Group 1). One hundred thirty-five patients were treated during the same period with no exposure (Group 2, control). One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated 1 to 3 months prior to TSN implementation (Group 3, control).
interventionTSN resources including educational materials, family classes, peer survivor visits, coaching, online services, and support groups.
main outcome measureA survey to assess hospital experience and perceptions about recovery.
resultsOn a Likert scale from 0 to 5, patients were highly satisfied (mean 4.24), with no differences based on TSN exposure. Patients exposed to TSN programming reported greater perceived likelihood of recovery: mean 3.73 vs 3.41 vs 3.38, Group 1 vs Group 2 vs Group 3 (
conclusionPatients were overall highly satisfied with their hospital stay, with those exposed to TSN services reporting greater perceived likelihood of recovery and return to daily activities. Development of nontraditional services, including peer visitation and support groups, appears to enhance expectations about recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.