Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937552›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2021

Long-term Outcomes of Lower Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Preoperative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy.

Wataru Sakamoto, Shinji Ohki, Hisashi Onozawa, Hirokazu Okayama, Hisahito Endo, Shotaro Fujita, Motonobu Saito, Zenichiro Saze, Tomoyuki Momma, Seiichi Takenoshita and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wataru SakamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Shinji OhkiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hisashi OnozawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hirokazu OkayamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hisahito EndoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Shotaro FujitaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Motonobu SaitoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Zenichiro SazeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Tomoyuki MommaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Seiichi TakenoshitaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Koji KonoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Fukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe standard strategy for advanced rectal cancer (RC) is preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT)/chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries; however, the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy remains unclear. There is accumulating evidence that either SCRT/CRT or lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) alone may not be sufficient for local control of advanced RC. We herein retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated by SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND, particularly focusing on the prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (LPNM).

methodsPatients diagnosed as having clinical Stage II and III lower RC who received SCRT/CRT+TME+LPND between 1999 and 2012 at our hospital were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs), surgery-related complications (SRC), and therapeutic effects were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsFifty cases (SCRT:25, CRT:25) were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence (LR), AE, and SRC between the SCRT and CRT groups, although the pathological therapeutic effect was higher in the CRT group. The patients with LPNM showed significantly inferior 5-year OS and 5-year RFS than those without LPNM.

conclusionsThere were no significant differences in OS, RFS, or LR between SCRT and CRT, although CRT had a significantly greater histological therapeutic effect. The prognosis of the pathological LPNM-positive cases was significantly poorer than that of pathological LPNM-negative cases.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapylateral pelvic lymph node dissectionlateral pelvic node metastasisradiotherapyrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33937552
PMCPMC8084532
OpenAlexW3159063696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.