Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937484›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2021

Sunscreen recommendations for patients with skin of color in the popular press and in the dermatology clinic.

Hannah Song, Ashley Beckles, Prerna Salian, Martina L Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Cutaneous Aging in Skin of Color: A Narrative Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sunscreens in pigmentary disorders: time to revise the message.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Sun Protection Used by Cyclists in Southern Brazil.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cost and quality in consumer sunscreen preferences.Archives of dermatological research · 2023
    Article
  16. Photoprotection in skin of color.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Melasma: The need for tailored photoprotection to improve clinical outcomes.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Photoprotection for Skin of Color.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah SongHarvard Combined Residency Program, Boston, MA, United States.
Ashley BecklesBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Prerna SalianBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Martina L PorterBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with skin of color are at risk for skin cancer, pigmentary disorders, and photo-exacerbated conditions but find it challenging to use sunscreens on the market that leave an obvious residue on their skin.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine sunscreen recommendations from the popular press and from practicing dermatologists for patients with skin of color.

methodsWe queried the Google search engine with the following search terms: "Sunscreen" with "skin of color," "dark skin," "black skin." For comparison, we also searched for "sunscreen" with "white skin," "pale skin," and "fair skin." We conducted an anonymous survey regarding sunscreen recommendations among dermatology trainees and board-certified dermatologists.

resultsWebsites with recommendations on sunscreens for patients with skin of color compared with sunscreens for white or fair skin were more likely to recommend chemical sunscreens (70% vs. 36%) and more expensive products (median: $14 vs. $11.3 per ounce), despite the lower sun protection factor level (median: 32.5 vs. 50). In our survey study, dermatologists were overall cost-conscious and felt that sun protection factor level, broad spectrum (ultraviolet A/B protection), and price were the most important features of sunscreens for their patients. Cosmetic elegance was deemed least important. Dermatologists overall counseled patients with skin of color less on sunscreen use, and 42.9% reported that they either never, rarely, or only sometimes take patients' skin type into account when making sunscreen recommendations.

conclusionThese data represent an area for growth within dermatology to improve culturally competent care by gaining familiarity with sunscreen types and formulations that are geared toward patients with skin of color.

Indexed as

ChemicalDark skinPale skinPhysicalSkin of colorSunscreenWhite skin

Identifiers

PMID33937484
PMCPMC8072489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.