ArticleComputing in cardiology2020
Novel Experimental Preparation to Assess Electrocardiographic Imaging Reconstruction Techniques.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High Density Body Surface Potential Mapping with Conducting Polymer-Eutectogel Electrode Arrays for ECG imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Tipping the scales of understanding: An engineering approach to design and implement whole-body cardiac electrophysiology experimental models.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of cardiac position using body surface potentials.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
- Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives.Hearts (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Simultaneous Multi-Heartbeat ECGI Solution with a Time-Varying Forward Model: a Joint Inverse Formulation.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) systems are still plagued by a myriad of controllable and uncontrollable sources of error, which makes studying and improving these systems difficult. To mitigate these errors, we developed a novel experimental preparation using a rigid pericardiac cage suspended in a torso-shaped electrolytic tank. The 256-electrode cage was designed to record signals 0.5-1.0 cm above the entire epicardial surface of an isolated heart. The cage and heart were fixed in a 192-electrode torso tank filled with electrolyte with predetermined conductivity. The resulting signals served as ground truth for ECGI performed using the boundary element method (BEM) and method of fundamental solutions (MFS) with three regularization techniques: Tikhonov zero-order (Tik0), Tikhonov second-order (Tik2), truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD). Each ECGI regularization technique reconstructed cage potentials from recorded torso potentials well with spatial correlation above 0.7, temporal correlation above 0.8, and root mean squared error values below 0.7 mV. The earliest site of activation was best identified by MFS using Tik0, which localized it to within a range of 1.9 and 4.8 cm. Our novel experimental preparation has shown unprecedented agreement with simulations and represents a new standard for ECGI validation studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.