Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33937041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer.

Huijia Yin, Dongdong Wang, Ruifang Yan, Xingxing Jin, Ying Hu, Zhansheng Zhai, Jinhui Duan, Jian Zhang, Kaiyu Wang, Dongming Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical MR Biomarkers.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huijia YinDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Dongdong WangDepartment of Radiology, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruifang YanDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Xingxing JinDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Ying HuDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Zhansheng ZhaiDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Jinhui DuanDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Kaiyu WangMR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Dongming HanDepartment of MR, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University · CNZhengzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of DKI and APT in prostate cancer (PCa), and their correlation with Gleason Score (GS). MATERIALS AND

methodsDKI and APT imaging of 49 patients with PCa and 51 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were collected and analyzed, respectively. According to the GS, the patients with PCa were divided into high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk groups. The mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusion (MD) and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym, 3.5 ppm) values among PCa, BPH, and different GS groups of PCa were compared and analyzed respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of each parameter was evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The correlation between each parameter and GS was analyzed by using Spearman's rank correlation.

resultsThe MK and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values were significantly higher in PCa group than in BPH group, while the MD value was significantly lower than in BPH group. The differences of MK/MD/MTRasym (3.5 ppm) between any two of the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were all statistically significant (p <0.05). The MK value showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in differentiating PCa and BPH, BPH and low-risk, low-risk and intermediate-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk (AUC = 0.965, 0.882, 0.839, 0.836). The MK/MD/MTRasym (3.ppm) values showed good and moderate correlation with GS (

conclusionDKI and APT imaging are valuable in the diagnosis of PCa and demonstrate strong correlation with GS, which has great significance in the risk assessment of PCa.

Indexed as

amide proton transferbenign prostatic hyperplasiadiffusion kurtosis imagingGleason scoreprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33937041
PMCPMC8082407
OpenAlexW3154115185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.