ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in echocardiographic images using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning framework for standardized interpretation of multiparameter cardiac ultrasound and disease classification.iScience · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Driven Innovations in Echocardiography: Taxonomy, Clinical Impact, Challenges, and Opportunities.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Classification of mitral regurgitation in echocardiography based on deep learning methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating Hemodynamic Changes in Preterm Infants Using Recent YOLO Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation and strain analysis of left heart chambers from long-axis CMR images.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Applications of Deep Learning Algorithms to Ultrasound Imaging Analysis in Preclinical Studies on In Vivo Animals.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Ejection Fraction Estimation from Echocardiograms Using Optimal Left Ventricle Feature Extraction Based on Clinical Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Segmentation of Anatomical Structures of the Left Heart from Echocardiographic Images Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated Endocardial Border Detection and Left Ventricular Functional Assessment in Echocardiography Using Deep Learning.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- TransConver: transformer and convolution parallel network for developing automatic brain tumor segmentation in MRI images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Machine learning algorithm using publicly available echo database for simplified "visual estimation" of left ventricular ejection fraction.World journal of experimental medicine · 2022Article
- A deep learning-based automatic staging method for early endometrial cancer on MRI images.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwo-dimensional echocardiography (2D echo) is the most widely used non-invasive imaging modality due to its fast acquisition time, low cost, and high temporal resolution. Boundary identification of left ventricle (LV) in 2D echo, i.e., image segmentation, is the first step to calculate relevant clinical parameters. Currently, LV segmentation in 2D echo is primarily conducted semi-manually. A fully-automatic segmentation of the LV wall needs further development.
methodsWe evaluated the performance of the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the segmentation of 2D echo images from 6 standard projections of the LV. We used two segmentation algorithms: U-net and segAN. The models were trained using an in-house dataset, which consists of 1,649 porcine images from 6 to 8 different pigs. In addition, a transfer learning approach was used for the segmentation of long-axis projections by training models with our database based on the previously trained weights obtained from Cardiac Acquisitions for Multi-structure Ultrasound Segmentation (CAMUS) dataset. The models were tested on a separate set of images from two other pigs by computing several metrics. The segmentation process was combined with a 3D reconstruction framework to quantify the physiological indices such as LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF).
resultsThe average dice metric for the LV cavity was 0.90 and 0.91 for the U-net and segAN, respectively, which was higher than 0.82 for the level-set (P value: 3.31×10
conclusionsThe results showed that both CNN models achieve higher performance on LV segmentation than the level-set method. The error of the reconstruction from automatic segmentation compared to the expert segmentation is less than 15%, which is within the 20% error of echo compared to the gold standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.