Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33936963›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in echocardiographic images using convolutional neural networks.

Taeouk Kim, Mohammadali Hedayat, Veronica V Vaitkus, Marek Belohlavek, Vinayak Krishnamurthy, Iman Borazjani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taeouk KimJ. Mike Walker '66, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Mohammadali HedayatJ. Mike Walker '66, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Veronica V VaitkusDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Marek BelohlavekDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Vinayak KrishnamurthyJ. Mike Walker '66, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Iman BorazjaniJ. Mike Walker '66, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo-dimensional echocardiography (2D echo) is the most widely used non-invasive imaging modality due to its fast acquisition time, low cost, and high temporal resolution. Boundary identification of left ventricle (LV) in 2D echo, i.e., image segmentation, is the first step to calculate relevant clinical parameters. Currently, LV segmentation in 2D echo is primarily conducted semi-manually. A fully-automatic segmentation of the LV wall needs further development.

methodsWe evaluated the performance of the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the segmentation of 2D echo images from 6 standard projections of the LV. We used two segmentation algorithms: U-net and segAN. The models were trained using an in-house dataset, which consists of 1,649 porcine images from 6 to 8 different pigs. In addition, a transfer learning approach was used for the segmentation of long-axis projections by training models with our database based on the previously trained weights obtained from Cardiac Acquisitions for Multi-structure Ultrasound Segmentation (CAMUS) dataset. The models were tested on a separate set of images from two other pigs by computing several metrics. The segmentation process was combined with a 3D reconstruction framework to quantify the physiological indices such as LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF).

resultsThe average dice metric for the LV cavity was 0.90 and 0.91 for the U-net and segAN, respectively, which was higher than 0.82 for the level-set (P value: 3.31×10

conclusionsThe results showed that both CNN models achieve higher performance on LV segmentation than the level-set method. The error of the reconstruction from automatic segmentation compared to the expert segmentation is less than 15%, which is within the 20% error of echo compared to the gold standard.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionConvolutional neural networks (CNNs)deep learningechocardiographyleft ventricle (LV)

Identifiers

PMID33936963
PMCPMC8047352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.