Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33936959›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Establishment and verification of a prediction model based on clinical characteristics and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters for distinguishing malignant from benign ground-glass nodules.

Rong Niu, Xiaonan Shao, Xiaoliang Shao, Zhenxing Jiang, Jianfeng Wang, Yuetao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nonlinear association between standardized uptake value (SUV) index based onQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rong NiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Xiaonan ShaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Xiaoliang ShaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Zhenxing JiangDepartment of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Jianfeng WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.
Yuetao WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and verify a prediction model for distinguishing malignant from benign ground-glass nodules (GGNs) combined with clinical characteristics and

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 170 patients (56 males and 114 females) with GGNs who underwent PET/CT and high-resolution CT examination in our hospital from November 2011 to December 2019. The clinical and imaging data of all patients were collected, and the nodules were randomly divided into a derivation set and a validation set. For the derivation set, we used multivariate logistic regression to develop a prediction model for distinguishing benign from malignant GGNs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the model, and the data in the validation set were used to verify the prediction model.

resultsAmong the 170 patients, 197 GGNs were confirmed via postoperative pathological examination or clinical follow-up. There were 21 patients with 27 GGNs in the benign group and 149 patients with 170 GGNs in the adenocarcinoma group. A total of five parameters, including the patient's sex, nodule location, margin, pleural indentation, and standardized uptake value (SUV) index (the ratio of nodule SUVmax to liver SUVmean), were selected to develop a prediction model for distinguishing benign from malignant GGNs. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.875 in the derivation set, with a sensitivity of 0.702 and a specificity of 0.923. The positive likelihood ratio was 9.131, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.322. In the validation set, the AUC of the model was 0.874, which was not significantly different from the derivation set (P=0.989).

conclusionsThis study developed and validated a prediction model based on

Indexed as

differential diagnosisfluorodeoxyglucose F18logistic modelsLung adenocarcinomapositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)

Identifiers

PMID33936959
PMCPMC8047343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.