Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33936443›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2020

Utilization of BPM+ Health for the Representation of Clinical Knowledge: A Framework for the Expression and Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) Utilizing Existing and Emerging Object Management Group (OMG) Standards.

Robert Lario, Steve Hasley, Stephen A White, Karen Eilbeck, Richard Soley, Stan Huff, Kensaku Kawamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Integrated Process for Co-Developing and Implementing Written and Computable Clinical Practice Guidelines.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert LarioDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Steve HasleyDepartment of OB/GYN/RS, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Stephen A WhiteStevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
Karen EilbeckDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Richard SoleyObject Management Group (OMG), Needham, MA.
Stan HuffDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG), meant to express best practices in healthcare, are commonly presented as narrative documents communicating care processes, decision making, and clinical case knowledge. However, these narratives in and of themselves lack the specificity and conciseness in their use of language to unambiguously express quality clinical recommendations. This impacts the confidence of clinicians, uptake, and implementation of the guidance. As important as the quality of the clinical knowledge articulated, is the quality of the language(s) and methods used to express the recommendations. In this paper, we propose the BPM+ family of modeling languages as a potential solution to this challenge. We present a formalized process and framework for translating CPGs into a standardized BPM+ model. Further, we discuss the features and characteristics of modeling languages that underpin the quality in expressing clinical recommendations. Using an existing CPG, we defined a systematic series of steps to deconstruct the CPG into knowledge constituents, assign CPG knowledge constituents to BPM+ elements, and re-assemble the parts into a clear, precise, and executable model. Limitations of both the CPG and the current BPM+ languages are discussed.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicProgramming LanguagesComputer SimulationDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID33936443
PMCPMC8075494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.