Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33936403›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2020

Capturing Clinician Reasoning in Electronic Health Records: An Exploratory Study of Under-Treated Essential Hypertension.

James J Cimino, Heather D Martin, Tiago K Colicchio

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James J CiminoInformatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Heather D MartinInformatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Tiago K ColicchioInformatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)TL1TR001418 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring response to antihypertensive medications is a frequent reason for outpatient visits. Blood pressure (BP) is often documented as elevated, but no change in medication occurs (Medication Non-adjustment or MNA). We studied the frequency of MNA, reasons for non-adjustment, how reasons (including reasons for patient nonadherence) were documented, and whether they could be represented in a clinical care context ontology. We examined 129 visit notes with MNA occurring in 80 cases (59%). We coded MNA as

Indexed as

Clinical ReasoningDecision Support TechniquesElectronic Health RecordsAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBiological OntologiesEssential HypertensionHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient CareAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID33936403
PMCPMC8075439
OpenAlexW3157391030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.