ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2020
Application of Machine Learning to Predict Patient No-Shows in an Academic Pediatric Ophthalmology Clinic.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Patients at High Risk of Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care: A Machine Learning Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Ophthalmic care at an academic medical centre for patients who were incarcerated or in immigration detention.Eye (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Bringing Precision to Pediatric Care: Explainable AI in Predicting No-Show Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of automated machine learning in detecting fundus diseases based on ophthalmologic B-scan ultrasound images.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Leveraging machine learning to enhance appointment adherence at a novel post-discharge care transition clinic.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Comparing code-free and bespoke deep learning approaches in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Decision analysis framework for predicting no-shows to appointments using machine learning algorithms.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patient "no-shows" are missed appointments resulting in clinical inefficiencies, revenue loss, and discontinuity of care. Using secondary electronic health record (EHR) data, we used machine learning to predict patient no-shows in follow-up and new patient visits in pediatric ophthalmology and to evaluate features for importance. The best model, XGBoost, had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) score of 0.90 for predicting no-shows in follow-up visits. The key findings from this study are: (1) secondary use of EHR data can be used to build datasets for predictive modeling and successfully predict patient no-shows in pediatric ophthalmology, (2) models predicting no-shows for follow-up visits are more accurate than those for new patient visits, and (3) the performance of predictive models is more robust in predicting no-shows compared to individual important features. We hope these models will be used for more effective interventions to mitigate the impact ofpatient no-shows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33936401PMC8075453W3158839988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.