Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33936058›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Clinical Experience and Recent Advances in the Development of

Mariam Oladejo, Yvonne Paterson, Laurence M Wood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combined radiation andMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Avoidance of MAIT cells is an essential determinant ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. ReprogrammingmBio · 2026
    Article
  8. Oral immunization withJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariam OladejoImmunotherapeutics and Biotechnology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Abilene, TX, United States.
Yvonne PatersonMicrobiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Laurence M WoodImmunotherapeutics and Biotechnology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Abilene, TX, United States.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Targeting Kidney Cancer-associated CD105 expression with a novel Listeria-based Vaccine ApproachR15CA216205 · NCI · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI WOOD, LAURENCE MICHAEL · 2017 to 2017
$377k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA216205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of tumor immunotherapy to significantly improve survival in patients who are refractory to long-standing therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation, is now being realized. While immune checkpoint inhibitors that target PD-1 and CTLA-4 are leading the charge in clinical efficacy, there are a number of other promising tumor immunotherapies in advanced development such as

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesAnimalsCancer VaccinesGenetic VectorsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsCancer Vaccinescancer vaccinesclinical trialsListeria monocytogenestumor antigenstumor immunotherapyvaccine vectors

Identifiers

PMID33936058
PMCPMC8081050
OpenAlexW3154458396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.