Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33935896›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021

Numerosities and Other Magnitudes in the Brains: A Comparative View.

Elena Lorenzi, Matilde Perrino, Giorgio Vallortigara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The role of musical pitch in long-distance defensive signaling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Neural Basis of Number Sense in Larval Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Number neurons in the nidopallium of young domestic chicks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena LorenziCentre for Mind/Brain Science, CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Matilde PerrinoCentre for Mind/Brain Science, CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Giorgio VallortigaraCentre for Mind/Brain Science, CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
University of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to represent, discriminate, and perform arithmetic operations on discrete quantities (numerosities) has been documented in a variety of species of different taxonomic groups, both vertebrates and invertebrates. We do not know, however, to what extent similarity in behavioral data corresponds to basic similarity in underlying neural mechanisms. Here, we review evidence for magnitude representation, both discrete (countable) and continuous, following the sensory input path from primary sensory systems to associative pallial territories in the vertebrate brains. We also speculate on possible underlying mechanisms in invertebrate brains and on the role played by modeling with artificial neural networks. This may provide a general overview on the nervous system involvement in approximating quantity in different animal species, and a general theoretical framework to future comparative studies on the neurobiology of number cognition.

Indexed as

approximate number systembraincomparative cognitioncomparative neurobiologynumbernumerosity

Identifiers

PMID33935896
PMCPMC8082025
OpenAlexW3153011007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.